Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time example. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it.

Awaiting reviewer assignment for a long time example One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. It can be faster than this but taking longer is more common. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Is it normal? Also, I see that it's been a while that the status has remained at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. My paper submissions (all to the Astrophysical Journal) have all been followed up by the editor within a week of initial submission. xml Templates The EiC/EC makes the final decision on the manuscript. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. 3. So, keep up your The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Apr 21, 2017 · My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. This question Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. will be marked with a red arrow as long as there are manuscripts waiting for reviews to come in, whether those manuscripts need immediate action from the Editor or not. I want to know if it is normal to wait a long time in order to change of status. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. 6. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. A month is a long time to go with no word. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? The statuses on submission portals change based on the journal's processes in real-time. 5. I know it’s not going to be fast especially for prestigious journal. makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". I have sent two pieces of mail to AE to inquire of the status, but I have not received any reply. How to handle situation in which the article has been "Awaiting reviewer assignment" for 5 months? 3. Although only 2 reviews are required, please assign reviewers until 4 reviewers agree to review. @ Another compulsive checker. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your Because the editor requested 2 reviewers for this paper (the default for JGR-Space Physics), the status of the paper reverts back to “Contacting” because the system still desires another reviewer. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. It has been a long time, so I have forgotten the specifics. 2013). However, I just noticed that the status of my Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. The status "Awaiting AE assignment" implies that an editor will be assigned to handle the correspondence of your submitted manuscript. Prior they told me that revisions in this stage only take 2-3 weeks (and last time they had to switch out a reviewer because they took so long, after my requests). This change has occurred 2. Up to 70% of requests for peer review sent out by journals are rejected by researchers because they have limited time or feel the article they are being asked to assess is After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Our SAP Certified Associate C_TS4CO_2021 practice exam questions are available at any time, anywhere, at your convenience, whether you want to prepare offline or I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". 6. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. Once the requisite number of reviewers has been assigned, the status will change to “under review. 8. Journal Evaluates the Reviews. Generally, the number of reviewers who agree to review is greater than or equal to 3 (in a few cases, 2 is also acceptable), and the status will change to "awaiting reviewer scores". However, these methods neglect the constraints of the RAP: incompleteness of the reviewer data and (Wang et al. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment indicates that the journal is using Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Diterima dengan The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. This change has occurred I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. awaiting reviewer assignment (or similar) if a new referee needs to be assigned and no Moreover, the key factors for the duration of an individual peer-review process are how EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". I submitted some that they processed and asked for reviewer assignments around a month. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. It’s more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. 2008), paper-reviewer assignment (PRA) (Long et al. It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision would be a relatively faster process. 21, awaiting AE decision. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Review Settings . 00 is highest; 1. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. g. This change has occurred Sep 10, 2020 · I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. What can this mean? The platform is I submitted a paper to some journal. As the Editor has not responded to an email, I would contact the Editorial Office (or journal Admin assistant) to follow up on the matter. The editor (or editorial office) has to check the submission to make sure it complies with I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. 2013), and reviewer assignment (RA) (Wang et al. The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. For example, the AE often needs to make several attempts to assign a sufficient number of reviewers and may need to assign additional ones when some reviewers do not do their work on time. The full manuscript will be accessible after the review assignment is accepted. " It's a s**t show. The review is then submitted to the journal, with the reviewer’s recommendation (e. Still the status is same. 0. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. In this Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. Now it is almost 3 weeks. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. Finding reviewers usually takes some time as reviewers are busy researchers themselves. Anybody know how long it should take a journal to assign reviewers to an article? I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # The status will change to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" then probably go through a couple more cycles of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Jul 7, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that the AE has sent your manuscript to a certain number of reviewers, waiting for their agreement to review. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. More If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I would call admissions and remind them of how interested you are in the program and that you were wondering how long the wait time is. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. The status of the paper changed several times. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". This change has occurred Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by-point review. For example, it depends on the journal where you 'Reviewers assigned' indicates that experts have been sent an invitation to evaluate your paper, while 'under review' suggests that your manuscript is actively being assessed by reviewers. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Download . Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Dear Dr. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. What The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I will disagree. This status indicates that a Managing Editor is being assigned based on that I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Since the paper forwarded for such intention had gone lapse to the point of one year then you better move on. " Should I expect a I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. Jul 6, 2017 · 4. View. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. You can invite one Reviewer at a time, with the ability to edit or The status “reviewer invited” implies that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and your paper will be sent for peer review. Four weeks is a long time for an Editor to sit on a decision. I'm not too sure, but the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So, your manuscript is awaiting a final decision. Some reviewers do not perform. As it has been only two weeks since you submitted your paper and only one week since the status changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment,’ you may need to wait for some time, let’s say, two-three weeks, for the next status update. How long I should wait for the final verdict? I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. Needless to say, I won't be submitting to SF any time soon, 6 years ago # QUOTE 4 GOOD 2 NO GOOD! Reply. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment or AE assigns reviewers) AE가 리뷰어 후보자들에게 논문 초록정도를 볼수 있게 해서 리뷰를 진행할 것인지 의견을 이메일로 보내서 그 응답을 기다리는 단계입니다. Jul 31, 2021 · Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. If this makes sense, Ic an post it How long should I wait for a response from the journal? you could wait for some time to know the decision. This also takes time. Reviewer assignments (i. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. The Editor-in-Chief or headquarters staff appoints reviewers for fixed or indefinite terms, and once assigned, a reviewer can access that paper on the web site. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. The second time I submitted, it has been almost a month, and it is still "Awaiting TE Assignment" I am truly speechless about the staff of this journal. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. This change has occurred Waiting time. e. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. 보통 2~3명의 reviewer를 선정하게 된다. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. I have to leave the institute within 2 months. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify? April 28th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment May 11th: Under review May 14th: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment June 4th: Awaiting Reviewer Scores July 4th: Awaiting AE Recommendation July 12th: Awaiting EIC Decision July 21st: Accepted Overall, the waiting time for the first review was very long, approximately 11 months, with a few reminders in between. If not, it will become "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" until now, and I don't know if it has been reviewed or not. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" For example, the editor or the editor's After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. But now, I submitted to another journal for a month but the journal admin has not processed it, not to mention getting to the editor. So, this might be a rapid-publication journal. For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making a with the topic model to propose the time-aware and topic-based (TATB) model. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. It went through all stages up to the Editor in Charge Decision. Chaos~ PaperSeeker 2022-06-01 Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; I have no idea why this is the case, but it meant that some papers stay on 'Reviews Completed' for a long time as we are securing and waiting for a third review report before making a decision. Ditolak 2. That is absolutely ridiculous to charge that much and take that long to send it out. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. All the best for your submission! Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Dec, 2021 . Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. What does it mean ? And what should I do regarding this based on your Manuscripts that are clearly of inferior quality should be rejected without peer review to avoid wasting reviewers’ time. An ideal routing of a manuscript from submission to acceptance consists of these steps: author staff (1) ASE (1) AE (1) RV (3) AE (2) ASE (1) ED (1) AU (2 Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. One month from submission to final decision does seem quick, especially if it seems to have gone through a peer review, as indicated by the ‘Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores’ status. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Special Editors act in the place of the Editor-in-Chief in cases where the Editor-in-Chief is the author of a submitted paper. Should a referee decline to review or not perform the review in a certain time (as given by the editor or journal), the editor usually has to select a new referee. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. I'm an Assistant Professor and I get far more review requests than I could ever handle, at the same time that my institutional service responsibilities are ramping up (fewer T-T Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. This change has occurred If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office determines if Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. This phenomenon has been occurring for quite a long time (Duggan 2007), appears more frequently in papers There’re numerous factors that can affect the peer review time. In the first notification, I got a major revision. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. Is it a bad sign? When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. Post We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. 6 %âãÏÓ 770 0 obj > endobj 779 0 obj >/Encrypt 771 0 R/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[046DF1E1B8084B44B9559A24C8516822>]/Index[770 130]/Info 769 0 R/Length 74/Prev I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023. This change I downvoted this answer because by far the most time consuming step is the peer review itself, and "awaiting AE assignment" is a sign that review has not started yet. to revise, accept or reject the paper). Ask Question Asked 5 years, 4 months ago. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. However, given the speed with which the statuses have changed so far, you could also know soon enough. I won’t cover every line like I did in the first post, but rather just those either not covered in that post or ones that might be confusing. Do not email to ask about The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. But today suddenly the status changed back to The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Viewed 2k times 0 . It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment lists all manuscripts for which Reviewers need to be chosen and invited. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Awaiting Reviewer Scores After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In the past three decades, many researchers have made a wealth of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. Assign new reviewers if some Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. One reason a paper can go from Editor Assigned to Editor Invited is if I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. This change has occurred Editor here. The reviewer assignment is overdue because the three invited reviewers did not agree to review Some reviewers suggest new reviewers when they decline to review. Okay, it has been sent for review again. %PDF-1. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. ” You can wait for some more time to see if the status changes. I submitted my paper and it has a status of awaiting ae assignment for 5 months. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time? Hope this helps. The paper can be either downloaded for printing or read directly in your browser, but you will need some mechanism for reading documents in ‘Page Description Format’ (PDF) files. THE R-SCORE What is the R-Score? The R-Score is a way to rate reviews in ScholarOne. There is no set time for this to take. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. I want to know how long will this status last. As the Editor has not responded to The status of my manuscript is "Awaiting AE decision", and it has lasted for nearly four months. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Please note that I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). " If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". This change has occurred Being in "reviewer invited" state for a long time before changing to "under review" : Is this a bad sign. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Can I send a email to AE? The review would only take a maximum period of 4 months in Elsevier based on experience. Dumais and Nielsen (1992) divided the problem · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has been completed I got a phone call from admissions letting me know that my app is in final committee review and I should know this by the end of this week or early next week! I applied for their MPP program. I submitted a manuscript that went Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Oct 29, 2015 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment (or AE assigns reviewers) AE가 reviewer 후보자들에게 논문 초록정도를 볼 수 있도록 해서 review를 할 수 있는지 여부를 이메일로 보내서 그 응답을 기다리는 단계이다. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which Once the submission passes these initial checks (so-called ‘Editorial Triage’) the paper is then assigned to two or more suitable peer reviewers. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Sep 1, 2022 · As can be inferred from Fig. Ideally, you should find out about your target journal’s review process and timelines before submission so that you can prepare yourself for the wait. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Here is an example of a table for a resubmission of a revised manuscript: It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. in Questions about SAP Websites 2023 Feb 20; My SAP Blog still under review in Questions about SAP Websites 2022 Nov 25 2023-08-03: Submitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2023-08-04: Returned by EIC Submitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2023-08-07: Awaiting SE Assignment 2023-08-08: Awaiting AE Assignment 2023-08-14: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2023-09-07: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-05-02: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2024-06-13: Awaiting AE Recommendation 2024-06 I know it varies from paper to paper. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If there is no update by then, you may consider writing to the editor about it. • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make Please help me out! I submitted a manuscript to a SCOPUS indexed journal some months ago. If that is the case, then the paper will go under review again and the time taken can be much longer. 00 means that no reviews have been rated. 00 is lowest. The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? Nov 2, 2020 · Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. In case if it gets rejected after 8-9 months, it will add up to the chaos of the author. Suddenly, the status has been changed to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for the second time. Each time I invite new reviewers, I budget thirty days before I receive a review. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Assigning paper to suitable reviewers is of great significance to ensure the accuracy and fairness of peer review results. 보통 2~3명, 많으면 4명까지 리뷰어를 선정하게 됩니다. Blog is still under Review. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. So, there is a second “Under Review” line item above this, indicating the time that a second person agreed to review the manuscript. May I ask how long it usually takes to resubmit a "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that the AE has sent your manuscript to a certain number of reviewers, waiting for their agreement to review. der_kokon 2023-05-26 it directly shows "under review". " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? If not, I would contact them immediately just to check up. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 7. Some examples include “editor assigned,” This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting It is also possible that the handling editor did find suitable reviewers, but they were not available to review your paper at the time. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; Comment. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed On average, the length of time it takes an editor to process a paper submitted to their journal and send it out for peer review is 2-3 weeks. The status of the paper was 'Submitted. Order of magnitude estimate for the entire stage would be 50–60 days. This change has occurred As far as I know, the "Awaiting EIC Decision" status is the final time when the chief editor to decide whether to accept or reject the paper, but it seems the editors handled with my manuscript a little slow. if the manuscript needs to be sent back to the authors for revisions (major or minor) or accept the Some editors keep a paper for a long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. Their latest update, received on 14/11/2023, stated: "We are currently waiting for the final reviewer's comments and will reach out as soon as a decision has been reached. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? To continue on with my explanation of the Manuscript Status Table in the GEMS system for each paper, here are a few more example tables. Hi. . 15-6. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. How long does it take to get an under review blog approved? in Questions about SAP Websites 2023 Mar 26; Blog Post not yet posted for Public. but it still says "under review". The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. Review is Conducted. This change has occurred That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number of publications that those grad students and post-docs could amass. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. The Many journals mention their expected review times on their websites: for example, Elsevier states that most of its journals communicate decisions to authors within 4 months. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. Why is the status of my manuscript showing "Awaiting Reviewers Assignment" and "Awaiting EiC Decision" at the same time? How long should I wait for a response from the journal? awaiting reviewer assignment means the the paper is due to be assigned for review. ygdhep lgo ghsq xlcpz vxst khnat puuxmo xzl eivgwcu emb