Awaiting reviewer invitation after minor revision reddit. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long.

Awaiting reviewer invitation after minor revision reddit Never saw that happen. Review was severely delayed: The review was I submitted a journal article a few months ago and, after going through 1 round of major revisions, I just got a decision that the paper requires minor revisions. For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets; Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) Reviewer 1 recommended acceptance with minor revisions and Reviewer 2 wanted major revisions before considering it further. Awaiting reviewer selection. " Related reading: Why Communicate clearly in submission, review and revision. I received After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The AE had to urge the reviewer. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. But usually, the paper with minor revision will be sent directly back to the same reviewers for the final decision. One of the reviewers accepted the revised version before this stage At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". This change has occurred I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing process is started already. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. It is rare After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. But my question is as below. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Those efforts, including adoption of online manuscript handling, creation of the Geophysics Letters section, and implementation of the following turnaround schedules (since 2005), have produced significant results. 3 Resubmission 2022. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. The review deadline given was 15 days, with only four possible outcomes: major revision, minor revision, acceptance • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. 06 Minor Revision 2023. Re-submitted after revision on 7. Papers should advance in each round of review. Handling a During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. Review was slightly delayed: The review was submitted less than 7 days after the agreed review due date. Both reviews were positive about the future of the article. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". But After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Since then, it has been more than 2 months, but we have yet to get a decision. 2. Pretty much the best outcome one can hope for in my field (biomedical science) when submitting to a decently high IF journal, I think? Do most of the post peer review rejections with these journals come after the first round of review? I got minor revision in the first round of review. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should be redone and re-reviewed. Computer Science 분야 논문인데요. 1. Note that the time it takes for an editor to Popular Articles. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the publication but the associate editor might have sent a few more invitations around. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Is that a bad sign? Then after submiting the minor revisions and waiting for two months I got major revision request and I was shocked. Now, again it Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Major revision requires lots of work but A major revision was submitted to a journal. co. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their Peer Review in Progress. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. 4 Acceptance 吴迪小哥 2022-08-06 Is this a retaliatory mentality after being rejected? I submitted my article earlier this year in January. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough of the invited reviewers accepted the invitation so further invitations need to be sent. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". This is at Cell, but interested to hear from anyone with experience at Elsevier journals! 🤞🏼 Edit: got the email, they’ve sent invitations out to reviewers! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. Know what the reviewers have asked you to do. Revised in April, received minor revisions in June It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). I have already addressed 4 peer-reviewers, and in my last submission I addressed the comments of the 4th reviewer. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Editorial review team inadvertently sent the revised paper to new reviewers instead of previous reviewers. Ou 2021-10-04 2021-7-9 submitted 2021-8-8 Reject (Resubmission Allowed) 2021-8-26 resubmission 2021-9-17 Minor Revision Required I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. 21 Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Revision 2022. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. 23, major revision on 10. 11. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. that means that you flat out can’t make relatively minor changes to the I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. 17 major revision 22. 25 Manuscript Received (status after minor revision) 2022. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. Stack Exchange Network. Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. I have a manuscript at Nature Communications that went out to review. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". Other reviews are still in progress. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". academicjournalpublishing. Reconsideration after major revision. Revise and resubmit is the same thing as revisions. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Different journals will explicitly say "revise and resubmit" or "we will be happy to look at Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. I submitted the revised version. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 24, accepted on 12. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. Also, you can do it sooner next time, after a month or so; 2. But from the Elsevier's tracking feature, I noticed one reviewer finished their review within 2 days of accepting the invitation. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Or check it out in the app stores They basically said they would like me to resubmit it after “minor revision and modification” and “please outline every change made in response to their (reviewers’) comments and provide suitable rebuttals for any comments not addressed Minor Revision. 29 Awaiting Referee Reports 2022. 투고하고 6개월 후 major revise 받았고 1달에 걸쳐 수정하여 제출했습니다. Humanities Reviewer 1 says to accept with minor revisions, reviewer 2 says to reject without recourse. Now I am curious about what this might mean. I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). You/your corresponding author can absolutely reach out to the editor and politely ask what the situation is. Reject and resubmit papers Depends on the exact definition of "major revision" for that journal. 5. 07 Resubmitted, Under review 2022. This change has occurred I received a minor revision from a good (in my opinion) mathematics journal. You said you recommended rejection twice now, and somewhat harshly because you perceived fatal flaws (that I assume you don't believe can be addressed in a revision). At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做 In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. They need We made the changes requested in the minor revision. In my field (medical applications of physics, let's say) minor revision (at the first revision) is purely theoretical. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Accept after minor revision, without re-review no need to submit for review. Recruiting new reviewers to evaluate a The first reviewer stated that if the article is re-written, it could be published. I just got a major revision request and the feedback seems pretty straightforward to address. In the second instance, I got a bunch of "this paper is excellent, and should need only minor changes" messages from reviewer 1 and 2. In addition, the academic editor initially assigned to it was also changed. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo [email protected] Submitted my paper. I still can't figure out why the editor sent the manuscript to a different reviewer after the revision; it was a minor revision. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers revision again. This change has occurred I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. This change has occurred [email protected] Submitted my paper. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. 2022. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but 22. Many common questions are answered in the Fiverr Help Center and in the Fiverr TOS, which are linked in the subreddit wiki, which also includes links to resources for new sellers looking for tips on getting started the right way. 07. That said, it's very helpful if the same set of reviewers agree to review a revision. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. 2. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. 1 Awaiting Referee Reports Recently, as a student, I received a review invitation from JPD. To check the status of your submission in o After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. 2023. " After a month, the scores were received, and a recommendation was made. The status after 3 days . Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. The editor seemed enthusiastic about the paper, and asked for the revisions before acceptance. IMPORTANT NOTE: Any comments with links to Fiverr will be Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. 17 Accepted Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 1 day - Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 1 month and 13 days - Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6 days - Awaiting AE Recommendation Popular Articles. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor revision" means "authors should fix this and this, and don Eventually, they reached the stage of "awaiting reviewer scores. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. That they haven't done that may be a sign that the third reviewer has asked for an extension. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Reviews completed: 0 Review invitations accepted: 0 Review invitations sent: 2+ Why does it take too long for a reviewer to either accept o reject a revision invitation? and What should I do about this? Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. 14 Submitted 2023. Then I revised and resubmitted. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. In both cases, you're making reviewer-suggested changes and sending your manuscript back. 09 Under review 2023. But the status of the paper is showing "under review" again. This stage indicates that your submission has passed the initial checks and is now awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer who will assess the changes you made in the revised version. 30 Awaiting Decision 2022. blogspot. Yet to receive an email. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. It is possible. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. To check the status of your submission in o The status has been stuck in "Under Review" since submission. The The status of the article is on awaiting reviewer scores. The initial peer reviews pointed out some flaws, so we were invited to submit a major revision. So I got minor revision and just resubmitted it. It’ll take work and a second revision after this one most likely, but I’m confident we will get it done. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. There’s only 1 comment, and I’ll probably submit the revision tomorrow- it won’t have to undergo peer review again, so I expect it will be accepted by next week. ’ the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. minor revision 후 under review 들어간 경우 어떤가요? [3] 안녕하세요. In this section: NEW! Featured Author Support; Tracking your submission; My paper has been accepted – what next? Appeals and rebuttals; BMJ Article Transfer Se Popular Articles. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. This change has occurred (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 그로부터 4개월 후 minor revise 받았고1달에 걸쳐 수정하여 제출했습니다. However, the editor has sent out another review invitation (#5 Reviewer). "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). In my field, it means that major rework (and probably new experiments/analysis) is needed and that that the editor may not see a possible way forward for the paper, but is giving you a chance to submit the reworked paper to the journal. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. 査読者への依頼待ち. I checked this AM and the status is "awaiting resubmission". After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept!" Submitted in November last year, received the first review notice in February this year. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. On April 20th, we received an acceptance email. 14 Revise and Resubmit It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. How can I check the status of my submitted paper? Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. Translation: 21. 13. It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few 论文小修后await. If a manuscript is rejected, do not give up. Rarely rejected after minor revisions unless the author just doesn't make any revisions at all and doesn't qualify why. The Elsevier Tracking system shows the following: Detailed Reviewer Activity. This change has occurred In most cases, if a paper is returned after a relatively minor revision, and you are satisfied that the authors have addressed the concerns of the reviewers, you do not need to send the paper out for another round of reviews. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but I don't know what "awaiting reviewer invitation" means. My question is how did it happen after minor revisions? From the start the 3rd reviewer was highly rejective while the first two positive. However, today, For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should So the thing is, I have been looking quite often on the Elsevier tracking system and it seems that many reviewers were invited (2+), after 2 months and only 1 accepted to review. But I wouldn't make any assumptions about who or what reviewer three is. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Respond to a Review Invitation. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Then, a few days ago, the status went to "review complete". 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 6. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. To submit for review after major revision, go through the review stage again. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where. 20 Accept As Regular Paper The text translates to: 2021. 05. As a reviewer, you are under no obligation to continue providing reviews. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. What will be the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. I know it's typically a bad sign if the reviews as a whole take only a short time (for example, the paper has the "under review" status only for a few days). same "review complete" status but different date. Maybe the . "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". Handling the R&R is important. Mr. 3. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". 10. The editor is likely to focus on the reviewer who requested I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. If a Major Revision does not advance to Minor Revision, the paper should be considered for rejection. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose Minor Revision. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 2. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". This change has occurred After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. The main concern of the reviewer was to add the details in methods section and some amendments in the text. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Also, the second round took 8 months. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. Or check it out in the app stores [ICLR] Misleading reviewer invitations must stop. To request extensions for revisions. My paper underwent a revision. Now, after that reviewer completed the review, that status changed immediatly to "Review Completed" and then to "Decision in Process". After 5 months I received a "Major revision". Under review. . The new reviewers But for a minor revision, it's common for the editor to approve the revision without needing to bounce back to the original reviewers (it's also common to send back to the original reviewers, I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. There's plenty of reasons for a minor delay like this. Then on September 19th, AE invited another batch of reviewers for review, and the invitation results were returned on September 25th (again, all reviewers rejected the invitation). How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. Please be civil, keep it on topic, and follow the subreddit rules and reddiquette. After you accept the invitation, you are expected to assess the paper and make one of the following I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. The . Geophysics is now a leader among Did you sent the updated version (after minor revision) in January -> two months it is fine to send an email to ask for an update Or did you sent your things 17th of March -> less then two weeks, so just be patient and if you haven't heard anything by mid April maybe email disclaimer: just my opinion, field and situation might differ. Has anyone experienced similar situation? I have posted before and received The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. 08. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an 2. I would recommend asking respectfully, showing that you understand they are busy. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. It roughly took around 19 days in total for this whole process. Step 10. I’ve also had the “here’s a major revision, but f*** you if you can actually complete the work” long shot type of major revisions. After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that the peer review was positive!! in fact the two peer reviewers had only minor comments that should have led However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. 03. and rather relied on the comments of th reviewer who asked for revision. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 9. The comments were entirely new. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. Or check it out in the app stores     TOPICS. 12. Is it normal for the status to change from under review to awaiting reviewer After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Revision; R2: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Assess and Recommend. 25 Minor revision 2022. If your work gets rejected at ICML and you try again with the fixed version at NeurIPS, then this is akin to a minor/major revision at Journals. More posts you may like A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". This may be true in some journals but not in others. This change has occurred On February 28th, we received the first round of revisions, which included two major revisions and one minor revision. I wrote an email to the editor asking if everything is ok and if I can be of further assistance, and they then sent it for review immediately after. This change has occurred 22. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. This change has occurred Review was on time: The review was returned by the agreed due date, which is 3 weeks, if applicable, plus the approved extension from the day the reviewer responded to the review invitation. 3. 5 months is quite a long time. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Reply reply Top 1% Rank by size . It is almost 5 months since resubmission. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. Now what I got is the 3rd reviewers comments only while others suggested publication. I re-submitted the paper after incorporating these changes in the manuscript (I work in Biology field). However, after I performed minor edits and resubmitted it, it went to under-review. 02 Submitted 2022. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. minor revision을 요청하는 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. To check the status of your submission in o If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. I have submitted a paper to an Elsevier journal and have already gone through 4 rounds of peer review and the editors have suggested a major revision each time. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. 4. 02. Does this I recently received two very positive reviews requiring minor edits in the IEEE Access journal. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Hi. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. Skip to main content. Send the paper out for subsequent rounds of review only if there remains doubt as to the acceptability of the paper. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. Sorry! nothing found for. What does the following editor response mean in Physical Review journal After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned For "good" business journals the rejection rate is something like: 30% desk rejected by the editor before going to review, 40-60% rejected in the first round of review, 10-20% rejected in subsequent rounds of review, only 5-10% papers submitted are actually published. Reject a paper when the submission does not meet publication standards. the status went to "review complete". 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 22. It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. The second one gave a more thorough review, raised some good questions, and said the general idea is good, but made no comment about whether the article should be published or not. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 04. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. But it's not uncommon to send the revised version back to the reviewers Q: Why is the status of my revised manuscript showing "Awaiting reviewer assignment"? I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. I don't understand this, am I going through a fresh round of peer review? Did they just invite a single reviewer to check my resubmission? Or is the editor "reviewing" it? It's an Elsevier journal, and it's Status on Editorial Manager changed from “With Editor” on Friday to “Under Review”. I made the changes, and then they each sent out lists with 6 or so substantive changes (eg re-work this 4 page discussion section to respond to X idea). I ask for a third opinion. This will help us the AE to find other reviewers in a timely manner. After conducting additional experiments and making careful modifications, we resubmitted the paper on April 10th. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. This change has occurred Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. Submitted on 11. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After submitting. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 2. 29 submitted after After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. uk has a great post or two about why review can take Hi everyone. 28 submitted 22. uzuhdb svx bfb fqr gigfjk wcawf pvl wdi tdgze zbmdo